<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why doesn&#8217;t openSUSE use smart as a default package manager</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zeroeffect.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/why-doesnt-opensuse-use-smart-as-a-default-package-manager/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zeroeffect.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/why-doesnt-opensuse-use-smart-as-a-default-package-manager/</link>
	<description>“I discovered I always have choices and sometimes it&#039;s only a choice of attitude.”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:10:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TuXero I</title>
		<link>http://zeroeffect.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/why-doesnt-opensuse-use-smart-as-a-default-package-manager/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>TuXero I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 21:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeroeffect.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/why-doesnt-opensuse-use-smart-as-a-default-package-manager/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Sorry guys i didn&#039;t notice that comment moderation was turned on :S .
SMART is an open source project which means they can modify and controlo it as they wish and in any way ZMD which is  the SLED tool has been removed from the community project .
&quot;Then again they may not use it because it’s Not Invented Here&quot; i thing you are right in this one as it&#039;s the only rational explanation to the issue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry guys i didn&#8217;t notice that comment moderation was turned on :S .<br />
SMART is an open source project which means they can modify and controlo it as they wish and in any way ZMD which is  the SLED tool has been removed from the community project .<br />
&#8220;Then again they may not use it because it’s Not Invented Here&#8221; i thing you are right in this one as it&#8217;s the only rational explanation to the issue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boycott Novell &#187; Do-No-Evil Saturday: OpenSUSE Faster and Better, Novell&#8217;s Financial Results Lift Stock</title>
		<link>http://zeroeffect.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/why-doesnt-opensuse-use-smart-as-a-default-package-manager/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Boycott Novell &#187; Do-No-Evil Saturday: OpenSUSE Faster and Better, Novell&#8217;s Financial Results Lift Stock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 01:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeroeffect.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/why-doesnt-opensuse-use-smart-as-a-default-package-manager/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] in SuSE/SUSE (I&#8217;ve been in SuSE&#8217;s &#8220;RPM hell&#8221; since 2003). Here is one new complaint/suggestion and here is another possible milestone.  The openSUSE 10.3 Beta 2 release brought down another [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in SuSE/SUSE (I&#8217;ve been in SuSE&#8217;s &#8220;RPM hell&#8221; since 2003). Here is one new complaint/suggestion and here is another possible milestone.  The openSUSE 10.3 Beta 2 release brought down another [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dosnlinux</title>
		<link>http://zeroeffect.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/why-doesnt-opensuse-use-smart-as-a-default-package-manager/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>dosnlinux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeroeffect.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/why-doesnt-opensuse-use-smart-as-a-default-package-manager/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>The only thing I can think of is that SUSE needs extra stability since it is an enterprise OS. The new system may not have as much testing, but Novell may be able to have as much control over the SMART product as they need.

Then again they may not use it because it&#039;s Not Invented Here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing I can think of is that SUSE needs extra stability since it is an enterprise OS. The new system may not have as much testing, but Novell may be able to have as much control over the SMART product as they need.</p>
<p>Then again they may not use it because it&#8217;s Not Invented Here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daP</title>
		<link>http://zeroeffect.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/why-doesnt-opensuse-use-smart-as-a-default-package-manager/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>daP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeroeffect.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/why-doesnt-opensuse-use-smart-as-a-default-package-manager/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Ever used smart on a x86_64 system? 

I recommend you give it a shot - might give you a whole new perspective why its used by default.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever used smart on a x86_64 system? </p>
<p>I recommend you give it a shot &#8211; might give you a whole new perspective why its used by default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
